Friday, 11 January 2013

Dismissal on non prosecution has no limit to be time barred

  Citation Name  : 2012  CLC  556     KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
  Side Appellant : JANGOO
Ss. 42, 39 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.IX, Rr.8 & 9---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S.5---Suit fordeclaration, perpetual injunction and cancellation of document---dismissal of suit for non-prosecution ---Restoration of---Matters fixed on that date when suit was dismissed, were of interlocutory nature---No substantive step or proceedings in the suit itself was contemplated or required to be undertaken on that date---Even the notices issued to the plaintiff were for the purposes of interlocutory matters---Court at the most could deal with the interlocutory matters and not the suit itself in its entirety---Unless the suit had been fixed for some substantive hearing or proceedings, it could not have been dismissed for non-prosecution ---Since the order dismissing the suit itself ought not to have been made at all, issue of limitation could not arise in the case and was not a bar to consider the application for restoration of suit on its merits---Suit should have been restored---Order dismissing the suit for non-prosecution , was set aside and the same was restored to its position as on that date. 

Contact International Lawyer

If you have any queries related with this post you can contact at

Salman Yousaf Khan
International Lawyer